From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ingo Lohmar Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: include new package wconf.el in GNU ELPA Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:24:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87vbd07k81.fsf@acer.localhost.com> References: <877fph8xwx.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <87d1z9a210.fsf@gnu.org> <871tfp8ir0.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <87lhdwhosp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1438334719 11065 80.91.229.3 (31 Jul 2015 09:25:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 31 11:25:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZL6Z2-0006M0-OI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:25:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43698 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZL6Z1-0008Jb-WA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:25:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51681) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZL6Ym-0008FL-7v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:25:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZL6Yi-00016n-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:25:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]:35686) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZL6Yb-00015H-JO; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:24:49 -0400 Original-Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so25210884wib.0; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 02:24:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=ym58Oxl+tPMkChnH3W82bCoWWHd0VGUMTpuRRtC4c1M=; b=I2pZP2wieLMG3htODcmfDEMVOAHtqXbwh8X3H3KqaXo1KeyiA6zB2OS2FVUNeBHAqL ZzFyxj0phSi57S2ekI59vvEQ1VCiyT1vrvRDjjNz3VlFYgsZGnHu1x2ODzOcrJTm4pRD t5LgAjLaiPYbqwdTQB7dwJMTu6n85tvsRGzUFCaBH1yICgaGRY5v1a1KbiF95iUarGmO CmcfcK+tP9NPn4HtDsvNQ5TKJlyqmRLFZehG+d8s2Nu7cSbICW8HfpPGJbuUEbwYGVls cbS4bO4QYRGgbP7o5i5xua2EThDIId1mN0Q8dbQ6xUP2dOqTvUOmZALPZBDt47L6fdFf wG1A== X-Received: by 10.194.176.201 with SMTP id ck9mr3828651wjc.108.1438334688885; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 02:24:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (xdsl-87-79-170-147.netcologne.de. [87.79.170.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ck18sm6158993wjb.47.2015.07.31.02.24.47 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 02:24:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87lhdwhosp.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+110~gb2cc2a6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188230 Archived-At: Hi Tassilo, On Fri, Jul 31 2015 07:35 (+0200), Tassilo Horn wrote: > > I've thought about it, and I think such an option should be in emacs > itself so that you can have that behavior with winner, wconf, or > whatever else you use for window config business. > > I had a look at the corresponding code in emacs, and actually the > restoration of point is not done in `set-window-configuration' but > instead it's done afterwards in `jump-to-register', in `winner-set', and > probably other places as well. That makes sense, and I will postpone the issue. It might still be feasible to do the changes in wconf after restoration (as a "unique selling point" :), feel free to let me know (preferably via a github issue) what would be the best way then. Regards, Ingo