From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rasmus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 09:33:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87vbak1me5.fsf@gmx.us> References: <5610207A.2000300@harpegolden.net> <83fv1r3gzp.fsf@gnu.org> <83bncf3f9k.fsf@gnu.org> <5610E0BC.8090902@online.de> <83si5r106e.fsf@gnu.org> <831td9z18h.fsf@gnu.org> <56134E71.6070704@yandex.ru> <56136BE9.6020302@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444116971 15782 80.91.229.3 (6 Oct 2015 07:36:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 07:36:11 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 06 09:35:58 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMmw-0006hE-C6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 09:35:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49373 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMmv-0006zb-Pa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 03:35:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47164) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMmU-0006xz-07 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 03:35:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMmO-0002op-SQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 03:35:25 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40215) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMmO-0002o0-MI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 03:35:20 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMmE-0006Hz-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 09:35:15 +0200 Original-Received: from 62.80.108.14 ([62.80.108.14]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 09:35:05 +0200 Original-Received: from rasmus by 62.80.108.14 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 09:35:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.80.108.14 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAAAAAByaaZbAAAAAmJLR0QA/4ePzL8AAAAJcEhZ cwAAAEgAAABIAEbJaz4AAAFcSURBVEjH1ZXbscMgDERTd9pQLdvHNsTMRcLIQmDj5CMzl3ESB3RY vbBf5cPx+iHAaY3DHJkAFIJoa7BFCKqV3tdfABOAPgnIMaWzZkuRDJgDPMTRb6jbsCnwWdDqu/mf Y/gqrSlT5A44/HR7bIAYbfu3Ayz5Ui/RGpRHAGu+8Zaa97Kq/iJLUpMvmn6V416hMH5wCxwNMWyB G4DyRjBpcsJroLZcBKTlDDfAmJXWQsxxh26tm429YGJZIpwHkXFDvW1xXQBsjQw9ZvZjIiKXQN9c zwrcuRzECYgsOuc8mhNA82QGsASQhtI2ajBcASz+BDApu0SNBcdTYAAYAS+gxa1NawXioFAywOJf tAKOAL0TJgXbGuduQ3v3OvQ1uLsTwGjp8TkQ+/IVTW4BzgpT0XroxNqlPECXyQrlUuFUeQDEENyL DdAa6RPABR4rMB307QslvyN++WL/v8Af4GqHu+Dr4gkAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMTEt MDctMjJUMTA6NTU6MzErMDI6MDD8c0dMAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDExLTA3LTIyVDEw OjU1OjMxKzAyOjAwjS7/8AAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0U5BKGxz337aio8TTXww1W4Ji9Q= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191004 Archived-At: Andreas Röhler writes: > Am 06.10.2015 um 06:30 schrieb Dmitry Gutov: >> On 10/06/2015 04:15 AM, Paul Nathan wrote: >> >>> Using SLIME and the Rust completion user interfaces is still a subpar >>> UI experience compared to IntelliJ or VS. >> >> You might want to clarify that statement in more detail. Creating a >> bug report would be best. > > Decisions where to head into these area train considerable investments. > Complex questions can't be rolled into a simple bug-report. Also it > surpasses a feature request. Andreas, with all respect, this statement is untrue. We are talking software here, not rocked science. The reason it is better can be broken down into a set of independent functionalities, that makes it betterᵀᴹ. For each feature in this set you can make a bug request. In order to make any progress, you've got to break down the problem into its parts. Rasmus -- Dung makes an excellent fertilizer