From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nikolaus Rath Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we go GTK-only? Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:25:03 -0700 Message-ID: <87vaw5r89d.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> References: <24db2975-17ca-ad01-20c8-df12071fa89a@dancol.org> <4615E73A-19E2-4B79-9889-D3FA686DDDE6@raeburn.org> <83bmy0pl8p.fsf@gnu.org> <831sywp7ew.fsf@gnu.org> <83y413nsjm.fsf@gnu.org> <83funbnngl.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1ifnmto.fsf@gnu.org> <20161101152027.5e94b6cc@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83ziljm0ei.fsf@gnu.org> <83ins5nai2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478114965 19444 195.159.176.226 (2 Nov 2016 19:29:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 19:29:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 02 20:29:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c21DS-0001Kr-WF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 20:28:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57339 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c21DV-0007Sq-RC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:28:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60363) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c21DP-0007Sk-JH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:28:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c21DM-0002yu-DO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:28:51 -0400 Original-Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:49791) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c21DM-0002yj-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:28:48 -0400 Original-Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABDD209C6 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:28:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:28:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= smtpout; bh=fdPIYdnbh3cKA/JQAVmqcwxyCX8=; b=Y2xmm+aV5V+ndZuYoJYy 33zRQejDT+7jZcVSxDM5+3IGNE6TqGeLtbeVBZafPjxhZ4OydFZJXmzBVxMxNVj6 9yGN3Sb/YHiPfEc9aS143rYewS04o7M6xADPuNN+VtlDwOPZlyuVeOl0bu9Aes8n 6daLkfWz4wzT/D3imqn6j20= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: XZeSvgqGTuYWu9bc4Rq0NfrnAExiZJuNMjZ51wQx/sH5 1478114927 Original-Received: from ebox.rath.org (ebox.rath.org [45.79.69.51]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 654A5CC0B9 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:28:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from thinkpad.rath.org (thinkpad [192.168.12.2]) by ebox.rath.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA87A681 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 19:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by thinkpad.rath.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A4304BFEF8; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:28:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:04:48 -0400") Mail-Copies-To: never Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.26 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209124 Archived-At: On Nov 02 2016, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> "Should", not "will". And on some systems, only with very recent >> library versions. > > Again: which system are you think of that's had a buggy > malloc-with-threads in the last, say, ten years? GNU libc on Linux in 2008, it seems: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D6952 (Just providing the link, personally I think that even with such bugs it it safe to assume a threadsafe malloc both then and now. Otherwise you may just as well assume that nothing works anywhere at all). Best, Nikolaus --=20 GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F =C2=BBTime flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.=C2= =AB