From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ? Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 06:08:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87vaon2b7r.fsf@jane> References: <2623E5C5-4D40-4C9F-BFF6-181D2E69F984@gmail.com> <831srgnuyc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495858103 32113 195.159.176.226 (27 May 2017 04:08:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 04:08:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 Cc: Jean-Christophe Helary , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 27 06:08:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dET1U-00088f-9c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 06:08:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39368 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dET1W-0006p3-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 00:08:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39406) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dET0u-0006ow-H3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 00:07:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dET0t-0005r1-Ra for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 00:07:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:59364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dET0p-0005q2-Vi; Sat, 27 May 2017 00:07:36 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0F0E67EA; Sat, 27 May 2017 06:07:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KlmtN7FQxpHU; Sat, 27 May 2017 06:07:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (static-dwadziewiec-jedenpiec7.echostar.pl [109.232.29.157]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8C35E6449; Sat, 27 May 2017 06:07:31 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <831srgnuyc.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.110.48.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215252 Archived-At: On 2017-05-23, at 04:55, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Just replace it with 2 different spellings dispatched by the number. I guess you are aware that 2 different spellings are not enough for certain languages...? In Polish: 0 pakiet=C3=B3w 1 pakiet 2, 3, 4 pakiety 5, 6, ..., 21 pakiet=C3=B3w 22, 23, 24 pakiety etc. Good luck with l10n. (I do not want to discourage work on it. But I'm afraid it's more difficult than many people think... OTOH, if a reasonable infrastructure is introduced in Emacs, I might be tempted to provide some translations for Polish.) Best, --=20 Marcin Borkowski