From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Entering emojis Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 20:24:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87v91jd4q9.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <874k94j3rn.fsf@gnus.org> <83v91kzydh.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuh4holf.fsf@gnus.org> <822aec9d01909cecfc6c@heytings.org> <87a6iwhltf.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuh4zfg5.fsf@gnu.org> <87y26gfobr.fsf@gnus.org> <87tuh4f1ie.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf2fg44h.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7d3g2uu.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl3bybm3.fsf@gnu.org> <878ryfr9w0.fsf@gmail.com> <878ryfg07k.fsf@gnus.org> <874k93r869.fsf@gmail.com> <87r1c7ekhn.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1c7psmy.fsf@gmail.com> <87cznrejrl.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl3bps4n.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35967"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , stefankangas@gmail.com, gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 20:28:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfRBa-00096T-Ol for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 20:28:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36580 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfRBZ-0000gR-Fs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:28:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfR7Y-0004wK-6A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:24:24 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:60232) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfR7V-0006ba-P0; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:24:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=LeC+pov2ucPQYMBrKZrOlxUghfrEgR8NSXkyQYbLFQQ=; b=tTFjy8XZsxiBqkexgHUF+RU0o2 uMLsNdAzyAdp1BCTYe85/28oW90Hz8PoLmiD9U2MT75t/d9AxxXPhR+KYkNmV5EVARZjhwNscczM/ iHCmYgP28u5oAMIMH9VhsXUszqwGEkjgydI6ceqlAQ8tK6/xh+W29wqM75nokIwd5ZfM=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfR7Q-0006Lv-HW; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 20:24:18 +0200 X-Now-Playing: Normil Hawaiians's _Return of the Ranters_: "The Battle of Stonehenge" In-Reply-To: <87bl3bps4n.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Tue, 26 Oct 2021 20:18:00 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277918 Archived-At: Robert Pluim writes: > Lars> 1F46E 200D 2640 FE0F is woman police officer > Lars> 1F46E 1F3FB 200D 2640 FE0F is woman police officer: light skin tone > > Lars> Well, that's the next-to-last code point? 2640? > > 1F3FB, in the second sequence, no? So, look for base + Emoji_Component 1F3FB is the hue, isn't it? So it's also there for the male police officers (of that hue), but other women police officers don't have 1F3FB. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no