From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Variable pitch text filling Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:09:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87v90byrxs.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87ilwft1ph.fsf@gnus.org> <837dcv2c2c.fsf@gnu.org> <875ysft0l3.fsf@gnus.org> <835yse3n01.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf1ars0f.fsf@gnus.org> <83czmm11t0.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7byrplm.fsf@gnus.org> <83a6hq0zey.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf19r7uv.fsf@gnus.org> <83tufxy7f0.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgpn13ce.fsf@gnus.org> <83v90buklw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27620"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 29 15:16:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mrhS2-0006xm-LT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:16:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53958 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mrhS1-0002na-K7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:16:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mrhLW-0000vo-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:09:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2] (port=47654 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mrhLS-0006Px-Dp; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:09:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BUlROni/KT7K2yWAN5PzJXAd7YAahRpXoxuDyQ1KDqs=; b=vPoCXvNyT8pnvrDqrKL7RrRF/a PWwLa6S0Os6ygCXLvdbNMZHJ3UhaaIcrGIEItp0ted6ivz7hgEhozZbgL5j9VFuY9nNx1mZHkfwJ1 8E+N5DoraOfzY6bkkDfMzQLRE78sddZdI5znCcSLds3ZSdW90exqm8IpaCOLrNU+T2L8=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mrhLM-0004yA-R7; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:09:23 +0100 X-Now-Playing: Colleen's _The Tunnel and the Clearing_: "The Crossing" In-Reply-To: <83v90buklw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:01:15 +0200") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -35 X-Spam_score: -3.6 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280481 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > It is also unnecessary, because having 2 pixels to the right of each > character is practically indistinguishable from having one pixel on > the left and 1 pixel on the right: you still end up with 2 pixels > between any two characters. The difference is with the characters above and below. When doing a monospaced "grid" display, the Roman characters will form a reliable grid while the CJK will be put to the left in their allotted space. Having them in the middle of that space might be more pleasing, but again, I think we need some input from CJK users here to see what they expect. And we could perhaps leave this as an option to be specified by the user (somehow). I.e., flush left, flush right and middle. But perhaps this is over-engineering again. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no