From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: sqlite3 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 13:22:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87v8zuypv2.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87tufmjyai.fsf@gnus.org> <87tufhel3z.fsf@posteo.net> <87fsr12tm8.fsf@gnus.org> <87y24s4ix2.fsf@posteo.net> <87pmq3x1yr.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf0qaozf.fsf@posteo.net> <87k0gah1ps.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6h69fsf.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21967"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 12 13:24:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mwNu0-0005RU-2u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 13:24:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37766 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwNty-0001fe-HF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 07:24:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwNsU-0000xz-Mo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 07:22:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2] (port=37724 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwNsS-0004PR-IJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 07:22:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vIV28+YqyOLki3TQ10qc2Un9xLlZX7zhuvorAN7/++k=; b=jFiX9GYysaDQM8MTAbz4Qb6i2z U3L6+GtPyrpjpYu+Lqj23qWHRsQ6xFIzsv3K1vSBdnbuS/mOh9SD/HMus0u6NCiv3zqJ4si9ENmuS 42xGOFxcpI9K3ksfT9WqtZ6QnlcWCPGpPYEa0hlTpsQgIcZ8IaO2IK5FP5+P9GM3TJ7o=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mwNsK-00056p-KI; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 13:22:47 +0100 X-Now-Playing: Caroline Shaw & =?utf-8?Q?S=C5=8D?= Percussion's _Let The Soil Play Its Simple Part_: "Cast the Bells in Sand" In-Reply-To: <87a6h69fsf.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:19:28 +0000") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -35 X-Spam_score: -3.6 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:281789 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: > I get that, is it defined or undefined behaviour if I mix in a few SQL > queries around various > > (multisession-value foo) > > calls? I don't understand what you mean. SQL queries ... towards which database? Doing what? And somebody talked about doing an implementation of this that wasn't backed by sqlite, in which case... nothing? (But if you deleted the backing storage to that method, it would affect something?) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no