From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature/package+vc 04c4c578c7 3/4: Allow for packages to be installed directly from VCS Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 13:16:55 +0000 Message-ID: <87v8nxh4xk.fsf@posteo.net> References: <164484721900.31751.1453162457552427931@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87ilkelc10.fsf@posteo.net> <878rl6syg8.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgdjqcu0.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgdivc3f.fsf@posteo.net> <874jvqv2u3.fsf@posteo.net> <875yg6qtbl.fsf@posteo.net> <83leoubj9p.fsf@gnu.org> <83iljyavgz.fsf@gnu.org> <9549e4e9-de49-435b-e085-539c89a476a3@yandex.ru> <83y1sta4vc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34505"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Dmitry Gutov , stefankangas@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 02 14:18:16 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oqDdG-0008my-Aa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 14:18:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqDcH-0006fm-Ia; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 09:17:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqDcB-0006eo-Pm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 09:17:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oqDc9-0002Zx-JT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 09:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30500240104 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 14:17:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1667395023; bh=eKao7VEmSy93H9o+QMf7r2h8Lt7VA042VHCPAqStsns=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=LIeXkxPLiufSIbKN60cvHUMlEQ8KxefoGgFgbU0vBASUf9GLTaScD+x0rD0jUSuvd 3B80NebASYADrclpYUOAo5umyGrSI1JJbkWYZzzudtisaXcJsI2hQFFieBCgpx7J1k 6wi+jHbIAbefmWVdlgU2aflU1IIvqYp2uV7LEtSVmCOScOXAcxQmyW+W85dUeYfxXz P5CAUcAMtTc1gvs+DikAz1odPOA81WrjNSagminkYrD8W0Mq796I+u6sggndSf5pS+ Pecn6CiRm0E2af/PYRizV7wan213+l6OTjGB7i1nzxw7CSXxQ1qoh5CTqCneyIEnaQ VuPdR8AaG2Nmw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4N2S8t11zGz6tpp; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 14:17:01 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83y1sta4vc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 02 Nov 2022 15:00:07 +0200") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299012 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 12:18:03 +0200 >> Cc: rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, philipk@posteo.net, >> emacs-devel@gnu.org >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> >> On 02.11.2022 05:25, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > Anyway, my point is that our current policy is to try to support all >> > the VCSes in VC at the same level. >> >> ...in VC. >> >> I'm not sure we should consider package-vc to be part of VC. > > From where I stand, package-vc is part of the same policy. I would also like this to be the case.