From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Permanently fix org versioning breakage during builds? Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 18:25:47 +0000 Message-ID: <87v88n1mqc.fsf@localhost> References: <25989.50971.995591.385250@google.com> <87a5q0dc9m.fsf@localhost> <87y1djc1c9.fsf@localhost> <87zfxzdbna.fsf@yahoo.com> <87plyv7oii.fsf@localhost> <8734vr4prv.fsf@localhost> <835y0nd4ut.fsf@gnu.org> <87zfxz35b4.fsf@localhost> <25992.27078.22115.25251@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87h6k7337x.fsf@localhost> <87a5pz31ws.fsf@localhost> <25992.30066.955176.760567@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14151"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "T.V Raman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 24 19:22:59 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rHT7r-0003Rc-92 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 19:22:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHT7Y-00056Y-PT; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 13:22:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHT7W-00056O-Op for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 13:22:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rHT7V-0000pK-0o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 13:22:38 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23CC9240029 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 19:22:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1703442155; bh=URdxydIJdW95In74Vl85482I3XIPMRXSLPiHD3ubCCY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=LyyUKkAaMF/C7hLP+AQURT/WFEgFzu/B5cSD1hLQwIURKcmuL+EOXGR3B/CzSuP2n uR5WDbbdpZMqIHoNjV+X/DSSDsYzNrCOnPKVuU+3o4Jxu28ExeFfjk6B9sKyk8UFW9 QOncYG4Fwoo7NJIbP8jcpQyZeBFQ++/0hamSdF59m6OU0QWUDpvacxR4qMWnBas/2g NEzPbu/htOpdaAuPX8Cm7OYhWZjc68sG9yjGABKos1vGLExl+PciUWOoLliQWdj/cq STm5dQj7HsYjKm1USvTt9hXVDbel4t5eZC5rJYVz8HwX2oqd81KFjo69uk6WTzrgy0 keB5IoGV2u4Sw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4SyqBy4F1tz6tw6; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 19:22:34 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <25992.30066.955176.760567@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -53 X-Spam_score: -5.4 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314171 Archived-At: "T.V Raman" writes: > But for those of us asking for a fix, "At what cost?" A broken Emacs > is in my opinion too high a price to pay, Emacs will no longer be broken. See https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=af1821673 >From my point of view, the discussion now is not about Emacs being broken because `org-assert-version' throws an error, but about other types of breakages - the ones `org-assert-version' is aiming to prevent; they existed for years. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at