From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomas Hlavaty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Declaring Lisp function types Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:21:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87v86dubvf.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> References: <389657c1-3bc5-4577-82a1-df4244ed5d58@alphapapa.net> <86v86ez6af.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1baz1i0.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <2827f3df-8eb2-431e-8491-f772e988474a@alphapapa.net> <87y1b9uc7f.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12979"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo , Adam Porter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 24 16:22:04 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rdtqm-00039e-4g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:22:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdtq3-0006qS-76; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 10:21:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdtpy-0006ps-0M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 10:21:14 -0500 Original-Received: from logand.com ([37.48.87.44]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdtpw-0000od-9o; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 10:21:13 -0500 Original-Received: by logand.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D688319E83F; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:21:09 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: emacs 28.2 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) In-Reply-To: <87y1b9uc7f.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.48.87.44; envelope-from=tom@logand.com; helo=logand.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316495 Archived-At: On Sat 24 Feb 2024 at 16:13, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > On Sat 24 Feb 2024 at 04:24, Andrea Corallo wrote: >>>> both are hard to grep for which is inconvenient >>> >>> "(declare (type" would be hard to grep for? Wouldn't that be a unique >>> string in Elisp code? I can't find any matches for that in master. >> >> Can't either for "(declare (function" :) > > there is no requirement that the space in between is what you both say > it is examples: (declare (debug t) (indent 1) (function ...)) (declare (debug t) (indent 1) (function ...)) your aproach will miss cases