From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Manuel Giraud via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] new single file package: mpdired.el Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 13:22:12 +0100 Message-ID: <87v85wud57.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> References: <87o7bpul9s.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <87frx158b3.fsf@posteo.net> <878r2tug4b.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <877cid55i9.fsf@posteo.net> Reply-To: Manuel Giraud Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39569"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Manuel Giraud via "Emacs development discussions." To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 08 13:23:25 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1riZG1-000A5g-P3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 13:23:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riZF0-0001Eh-9Z; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 07:22:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riZEy-0001Dy-0p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 07:22:20 -0500 Original-Received: from ledu-giraud.fr ([51.159.28.247]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riZEv-0008Jb-U2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 07:22:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=ed25519; bh=r2y7mi/U RfNe+crkPNqTITtpuC3Yl6YXAvfS9hurcL8=; h=date:references:in-reply-to: subject:cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=pH3tVvj0IGfdPoqZwf4kQj0iv2b4Ae FARlV/06CLLy7a0T4CprgZhALYStGSXszWU6ZPU0+8KfnpCfzT6weuAg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=rsa; bh=r2y7mi/URfNe+crk PNqTITtpuC3Yl6YXAvfS9hurcL8=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=CflDHxWwfVZ1QfAGXqKyVUTsLInQL2de/O937B MJhK3NFk13p31grShXvL0YMymKON4EymDODgwos3vCv2U8zVXYM33uG2+WjIbOTvAie7jE i8BRNFdpXPq7QzREz3bQTzy/fPrEIreEq0ICbqp1pbqWW7YR++Y7O+xrpCkhnCVaQfNARR yU7s7HRITkjRFXk8FdrOLK5H9cLYFKdOjx1w2OFkaOjRnt9iN6gaWbLKnihB7rGql8l/zD GC8zTkkxxYX61S38aW3schAyDjtx7pMpm1T0EE5Nlf9T8tw90FV/0YZvOC+Kuk0vQEP/3/ dqJaLMCYrfDElmd4IW5MT0Xw== Original-Received: from computer ( [10.1.1.1]) by ledu-giraud.fr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 97b227fa (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 8 Mar 2024 13:22:14 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <877cid55i9.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Fri, 08 Mar 2024 11:26:22 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=51.159.28.247; envelope-from=manuel@ledu-giraud.fr; helo=ledu-giraud.fr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316900 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: [...] >> Of course, I'd also like to avoid this latter setup. Just to be sure, >> you confirm that a git repo is unavoidable? Could it be a just tarball >> available on web server? > > Technically yes, but the ELPA build system would have to be updated just > for this use-case. Ok so it's a "no": I don't want to put a burden on someone else. [...] >> Ok. If a git forge is mandatory, I'll ponder which one I'd prefer to >> use. > > As I said, a git forge in that sense is not necessarily needed, you > could also just host the git repository from some website over > https://. Great. I think it is what I would do then. Thanks. [...] >>> Perhaps one could also rebind a few commands here, like `next-line'. >> >> I don't understand what you mean here. > > It is possible to remap a command, without having to bind a key. See > (elisp) Remapping Commands. The advantage is that if the user has any > custom bindings, say for next-line, then they would automatically be > inherited. That is comfortable from a user-perspective, because the > major-mode aligns more with their usual intuition. Yes it makes sense. I'll look at it. -- Manuel Giraud