From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lute Kamstra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: org-mode and mode hooks. Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 19:31:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87u0kpki62.fsf@xs4all.nl> References: <87y8a3mnz8.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87ll63weye.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200505251624.j4PGOBF24551@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87hdgql1nd.fsf@xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117129114 31000 80.91.229.2 (26 May 2005 17:38:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 17:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dominik@science.uva.nl, Luc Teirlinck , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 26 19:38:33 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DbMGH-0003pv-Qk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 19:35:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DbMKO-000857-H1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:39:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DbMIq-0006Pl-VD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:37:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DbMIj-0006F5-QH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:37:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DbMIg-00069V-CC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:37:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.109.24.28] (helo=smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DbMDy-00063U-1w; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:32:50 -0400 Original-Received: from pijl (a80-127-67-124.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.67.124]) by smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4QHVoNo088833; Thu, 26 May 2005 19:31:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Lute.Kamstra@xs4all.nl) Original-Received: from lute by pijl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DbMCz-0003Qv-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 19:31:49 +0200 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87hdgql1nd.fsf@xs4all.nl> (Lute Kamstra's message of "Thu, 26 May 2005 12:31:02 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Original-Lines: 19 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37719 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37719 Lute Kamstra writes: > Richard Stallman writes: > >> If there are any major modes that fail to use run-mode-hooks, we want >> to fix them now. It would be good for someone to look for them. > > I'll do that. I've fixed some 100 major modes by grepping lisp files for "(.*run-hooks.*mode". I didn't fix Gnus. Maybe someone here can ask the Gnus developers to do that? Of course my method failed to find any major modes that don't run mode hooks at all. Maybe someone else could try to fix those? Lute.