From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GC crashes Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:24:58 -0500 Message-ID: <87u0dbi7n9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87slsv8i2m.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <85vexrgte9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134606036 14666 80.91.229.2 (15 Dec 2005 00:20:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 15 01:20:34 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Emgpz-0006lA-SF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:19:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Emgqb-0007BD-UL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:19:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Emfyx-0001Nz-KW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:24:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Emfyu-0001MI-DW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:24:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Emfyt-0001MC-Uk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:24:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.19.6.82] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Emg0z-00053V-5k; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:26:29 -0500 Original-Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D5428120800; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:24:58 -0500 (EST) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85vexrgte9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:18:06 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47749 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: >> #0 initialize_cut_buffers (display=0x8, window=16843009) at xselect.c:2316 >> data = (unsigned char *) 0x820c124 "\213\367\017\b\001" >> >> #1 0x080ff866 in Fx_rotate_cut_buffers_internal (n=8) at xselect.c:2470 >> window = 73 >> props = {0, 0, 0, 0, 136364324, 138120105, 3220375768, 135779857} >> display = (Display *) 0x8748060 >> sf = (struct frame *) 0x856d418 > > from etc/DEBUG: > > ** When you are trying to analyze failed assertions, it will be > essential to compile Emacs either completely without optimizations or > at least (when using GCC) with the -fno-crossjumping option. Failure > to do so may make the compiler recycle the same abort call for all > assertions in a given function, rendering the stack backtrace useless > for identifying the specific failed assertion. This was a bus error, not a failed assertion. Also, I believe he compiled Emacs with `-O0'.