storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes:

> michael.cadilhac@lrde.org (Michaël Cadilhac) writes:
>
>> It seems  that the  guard we  put (#ifdef SIGCHLD)  was not  the right
>> thing to do, isn't it ?
>
> I promised Eli to shut up

Please don't  :-)

> but it once again occurred to me that the sigchld_handler is only
> called _IF_ SIGCHLD is defined.

> Since the sigchld_handler is only installed if SIGCHLD is defined,
> it will only ever be called (to cleanup deleted_pid_list) if
> SIGCHLD is defined.

> So it still seems wrong to put anything on deleted_pid_list unless
> SIGCHLD is defined ...

> And sigchld_handler should be conditioned by #ifdef SIGCHLD.

Aaaand here comes the new new new (super better) new great patch
v3923.3 (beta 1) !