From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Crash force-deleting the only frame Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:19:49 -0500 Message-ID: <87u01ji1ga.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87irhzopsv.fsf@cs.cmu.edu> <87lkmvp4pz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162398038 16861 80.91.229.2 (1 Nov 2006 16:20:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Welsh Duggan , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 01 17:20:35 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfIp4-0007zj-31 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:20:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfIp3-00029O-JE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:20:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GfIop-00027P-QV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GfIol-0001x2-8q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfIok-0001wj-Uh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:19:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.19.1.138] (helo=cyd) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GfIoe-0008V6-OR; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:19:48 -0500 Original-Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0CD954E452; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:19:50 -0500 (EST) Original-To: "Juanma Barranquero" In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Wed\, 1 Nov 2006 16\:32\:36 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61554 Archived-At: "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > On 11/1/06, Chong Yidong wrote: > >> The sit-for isn't necessary; >> >> emacs --eval "(delete-frame (selected-frame) t)" > > I know. I added it to be sure the frame was fully created and > displayed before trying to delete it. Okay, I looked at this, and now I'm not sure there's any bug. If you specify an --eval command-line arg that deletes the only frame, what else could Emacs possibly do other than abort execution? "Fatal error (6)Aborted" is an abort; it's not really a crash.