From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jay Belanger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: a bug in erc manual Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 20:24:51 -0500 Message-ID: <87tzu0s7fg.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ps4o75uh.fsf@hariken.mwolson.org> Reply-To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180142705 21884 80.91.229.12 (26 May 2007 01:25:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 01:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 26 03:25:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hrl1j-0006hZ-4i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 May 2007 03:25:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hrl1i-0002ns-FO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 21:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hrl1d-0002kt-Um for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 21:24:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hrl1b-0002kh-GO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 21:24:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hrl1b-0002ke-E6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 21:24:55 -0400 Original-Received: from s4.cableone.net ([24.116.0.230]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hrl1b-0008V5-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 21:24:55 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (unverified [24.117.100.184]) by S4.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S4) with ESMTP id 109280621 for multiple; Fri, 25 May 2007 18:24:53 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87ps4o75uh.fsf@hariken.mwolson.org> (Michael Olson's message of "Fri\, 25 May 2007 21\:04\:38 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 52, in=27, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.117.100.184 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71827 Archived-At: Michael Olson writes: > Leo writes: > >> (info "(erc)Modules") >> >> ,---- >> | `completion' >> | Complete nicknames and commands (old). This is the old module--you >> | might prefer the "completion" module instead. >> `---- >> >> Does this sentence make sense? > > It makes sense, but perhaps it is terse. Does the following sound > better? > > This is the old module. You might prefer to use the "completion" > module instead. But it's describing the "completion" module. Perhaps you mean that the "pcomplete" module is preferable. Jay