From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: make-glyph-code incompatibility Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:58:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87tzjm95fo.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> References: <873ar773m1.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204625230 9899 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2008 10:07:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 04 11:07:33 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWU3E-0000g4-KO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:07:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWU2h-0003YM-En for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 05:06:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWTuk-0000rd-2Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:58:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWTui-0000qh-Sr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:58:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWTuh-0000qB-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:58:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-relay.sonofon.dk ([212.88.64.25]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWTuh-0001kl-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:58:23 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 25891 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2008 09:58:20 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO kfs-lx.rd.rdm.cua.dk) (213.83.150.21) by 0 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2008 09:58:20 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue\, 04 Mar 2008 06\:21\:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91272 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Yes. But you could make the new code use different symbols, and make > old symbols be unbound. That would cause error messages early enough. What symbols? The display table slots? That would break more code - including code properly written to use make-glyph-code in emacs 22... -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk