From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lazy Isearch in dired Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:07:25 -0500 Message-ID: <87tzab4ks2.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <87d4h5ew7x.fsf@jurta.org> <87fxlv4pa7.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <878wrn4p6a.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87r65fh9lw.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1226597609 18465 80.91.229.12 (13 Nov 2008 17:33:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 13 18:34:30 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L0g5E-0004DG-0o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:34:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47284 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L0g45-0006zr-T3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:33:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L0ff3-0000Bt-W5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:07:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L0ff2-0000B3-Di for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:07:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43198 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L0ff2-0000Ay-B5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:07:16 -0500 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.115.2.24]:32817) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L0ff2-0002xI-5U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:07:16 -0500 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3304957E09E; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:07:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87r65fh9lw.fsf@jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:30:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105656 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: > In normal cases there is no slowdown because the new additional > loop gets executed only once. And in cases with a restricted search > (with invisible matches or matches outside of the search space) > there is really a speedup instead of slowdown because unnecessary > overlays for lazy highlights never get created - these places are > skipped with a new loop. I see. Thanks.