From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: mail@justinbogner.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reviewing changes Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:08:34 -0700 Message-ID: <87tza167r1.fsf@justinbogner.com> References: <87y6zggnmz.fsf@red-bean.com> <87d4grbcc0.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227240553 21790 80.91.229.12 (21 Nov 2008 04:09:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:09:13 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 21 05:10:15 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L3NLM-0001MV-Hi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:10:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50292 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L3NKD-0006dm-75 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:08:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L3NK2-0006bO-AZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:08:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L3NK1-0006b0-Bk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:08:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42542 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L3NK1-0006ax-4R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:08:45 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:46418 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L3NK1-0004vx-56 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:08:45 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L3NJy-0007pH-LI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:08:42 +0000 Original-Received: from s010600131023ed49.ed.shawcable.net ([68.149.184.55]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:08:42 +0000 Original-Received: from mail by s010600131023ed49.ed.shawcable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:08:42 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s010600131023ed49.ed.shawcable.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pq3z8wDmDdoTfTAkN2HLvvevwzs= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105875 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> No, we don't. What we have is random (and very rare) comments, and no >> mechanism to resolve disagreements when they happen. > > So you object to naming them "code reviews"? That's OK, let's call them > "random comments", then. > > I just can't see how encouraging such random comments can hurt. > Agreed, this isn't a proposal for "code reviews", but for more frequent random comments.