From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MS-Windows build broken in Fmake_network_process Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:37:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87tys12sdy.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <83634jglab.fsf@gnu.org> <831vf7ge57.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6hfeyzw.fsf@gnu.org> <83vdcig87f.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4sywpvv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83tys2fbxs.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbo1iubm.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <83ljddg0w9.fsf@gnu.org> <4BAE867D.3030404@gmail.com> <4BAE9ED4.6070900@t-online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269736683 12340 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2010 00:38:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:38:03 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 28 01:37:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvgVq-0005yC-UX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:37:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57344 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvgVq-0004QX-DU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:37:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NvgVl-0004QF-Na for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:37:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57078 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvgVh-0004Q5-K7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:37:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvgVe-00026k-L2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:37:49 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvgVe-00026c-9K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:37:46 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvgVZ-0005uK-Eq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:37:41 +0100 Original-Received: from 83.32.114.13 ([83.32.114.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:37:41 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 83.32.114.13 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:37:41 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.32.114.13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.93 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ztn8GaNEdovVM27czm8UOmGZdZ0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122780 Archived-At: Florian Beck writes: >>> How is this not a concern anymore? We didn't stop supporting >>> Windows 9X, did we? >>> >> Microsoft did. Why don't we? > > Hardware. Windows 9X is the main choice for old machines (like 64MB > ram). Don't take that away without need. If they run a 15 year old trashy OS, do they really demand the latest and greatest Emacs? (which is a very fat application for such machines)