From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: no-spam@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#5765: Strange things happens with C-v in read-file-name Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:58:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87tyqtntxi.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> References: <87eij9r6hu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87iq8l1mbc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877hnqpk08.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <8739ye1d08.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272621519 15354 80.91.229.12 (30 Apr 2010 09:58:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5765@debbugs.gnu.org, Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , "Kim F. Storm" To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 30 11:58:37 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7mzU-0005CL-Ax for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:58:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33130 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7mzT-0007nj-Ku for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 05:58:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O7mzL-0007nd-Ci for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 05:58:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36388 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7mzH-0007nU-QB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 05:58:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7mzG-0005Fg-0L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 05:58:23 -0400 Original-Received: from ge0.mail1.hoer.dk.ip.fullrate.dk ([90.185.1.42]:51015 helo=smtp.fullrate.dk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7mzF-0005F6-Q8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 05:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-lx.rd.rdm.cua.dk (3008ds4-amb.0.fullrate.dk [90.184.173.162]) by smtp.fullrate.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id AD9D89D03D; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:58:17 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Fri, 30 Apr 2010 01:54:34 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124346 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Stefan Monnier > wrote: >>> But maybe it is serious enough for the release because CUA keys does >>> not work in the minibuffer at all without this change. (And I doubt it >>> can break anything.) >> >> It's been that way for a long time, so there's no hurry to fix it. > > > Normally I would agree with that reasoning, but not here. The reason > it has been this way for a long time is probably because cua-mode has > not got much attention. It has been kind of a second class citizen. > Perhaps no one really expected it to work. I think it would be good to > show that we care about this. > > Doesn't this change only affect cua-mode users? I think those desire > this change. The basic question is: Is this a regression wrt 23.1 or not? -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk