From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug statistics Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 09:48:58 +0900 Message-ID: <87tyoqmxdx.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <1focf1eb1p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <201006241959.12567.tassilo@member.fsf.org> <83hbkre7fj.fsf@gnu.org> <201006251307.09030.tassilo@member.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277513581 24348 80.91.229.12 (26 Jun 2010 00:53:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 00:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 26 02:52:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSJdh-0003Vp-Pr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 02:52:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39221 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSJdh-0005Ql-7U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:52:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46208 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OSJdb-0005O7-PU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:52:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSJda-0002X7-Kc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:52:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:46594) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OSJdY-0002Wl-Cc; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:52:48 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3ACB7FFA; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 09:52:46 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 99F7E12136B; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 09:48:58 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <201006251307.09030.tassilo@member.fsf.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" a03421eb562b XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126414 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn writes: > And it's no burden to the user. If I didn't have time, I could skip > checking the suggested relevant bugs and file my bug as new bug, thus > putting the burden on the developers. At least on Launchpad (Canonical's tracker), it *is* a burden. Launchpad is slow and there is no way to short-circuit the process. I've left several bugs unreported because it was too frustrating waiting for the hand-holding. > Especially this "making easy" is not the strong point of debbugs. :-( Heh. The Bazaar developers just made the same comment about dpkg. :-)