From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Sieger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20100719 windows binaries Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:24:36 -0400 Message-ID: <87tynvsiy3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87aapnoeh2.fsf@gmail.com> <8739vftykv.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279545901 9671 80.91.229.12 (19 Jul 2010 13:25:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:25:01 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 19 15:24:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OaqL1-0000uI-Mr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:24:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36762 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OaqL1-0005Mb-2C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:24:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55475 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OaqKv-0005MW-OL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:24:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OaqKu-0003Ld-OK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:24:49 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:52124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OaqKu-0003LX-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:24:48 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OaqKr-0000nh-JT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:24:45 +0200 Original-Received: from pool-68-161-33-43.ny325.east.verizon.net ([68.161.33.43]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:24:45 +0200 Original-Received: from sean.sieger by pool-68-161-33-43.ny325.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:24:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-68-161-33-43.ny325.east.verizon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jleHCyxsk02vwZsciNnxrAhqcIk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127576 Archived-At: Sean Sieger writes: As your binaries are non-optimized builds for testing purposes, may I suggest building with new option --enable-checking from now on? (Assuming you weren't already defining ENABLE_CHECKING and XASSERTS by hand). Certainly, thank you for the suggestion. I just did `configure --help'; how do I score more elaborate information? Um, I found it in NEWS.23. Please ignore ...