From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Elisp native profiler Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:03:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87txui8tg6.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> References: <83zk4egs0w.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5jygrni.fsf@gnu.org> <50620443.8050301@cs.ucla.edu> <20120926151625.229ef3cc9caf90e5098b18ef@cx4a.org> <83ipb1grs9.fsf@gnu.org> <20120926165946.87a9f8c58aad890dafb50494@cx4a.org> <83d319gmd6.fsf@gnu.org> <20120927074655.a943e298fc9319a438825f47@cx4a.org> <83wqzgf1qs.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcf0eyp2.fsf@gnu.org> <83mx0bgxp4.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3vfgpn9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348819455 10464 80.91.229.3 (28 Sep 2012 08:04:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 08:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tomo@cx4a.org, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 28 10:04:20 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1THVYa-00007T-66 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:04:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58619 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THVYU-0002hZ-JV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:04:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41497) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THVYJ-0002bx-4a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:04:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THVYE-00020F-NE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:40950) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THVYE-0001zO-CY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:03:58 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2012 08:03:55 -0000 Original-Received: from i59F57DDA.versanet.de (EHLO rosalinde.fritz.box) [89.245.125.218] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 28 Sep 2012 10:03:55 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20778731 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1907Pg0Bk90VLw6z94ppy9fwwoztkypxv5zMK8QNR EHsswf7PJYGwTS In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:12:50 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 213.165.64.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153660 Archived-At: On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:12:50 -0400 Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> > Lisp Backtrace: >>> > "Automatic Redisplay" (0x1649638) >>> > What is this "Automatic Redisplay" about? >>> It's an entry for the function redisplay_internal. >> Why not write redisplay_internal, then? > > Because the names that appear there are supposed to be Elisp names, not > C names. Maybe we could use a convention like "C redisplay_internal" > or "redisplay_internal (C)"? Doesn't the underscore already conventionally identify it as a C name? It seems at least as odd to me to see "C redisplay_internal" or "redisplay_internal (C)" as to see simply "redisplay_internal" in a list identified as "Lisp Backtrace". Steve Berman