From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code - some ideas Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 01:05:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87txmzfprk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ehe3iyo7.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366585557 2826 80.91.229.3 (21 Apr 2013 23:05:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien?= Aptel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 22 01:06:01 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UU3KY-000798-NO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 01:05:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60388 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UU3KY-0007yG-8u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:05:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50560) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UU3KV-0007xG-9q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:05:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UU3KU-0005oi-7k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:05:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:42081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UU3KU-0005oe-0K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:05:54 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id c10so3384415wiw.6 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:05:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/cik999ZpFECaSkzyuCjB3vhdoCtGX2dKX2GjKJvsVU=; b=vwMS48GqrdQt3eh4KkZg62zNriUgp1ON4KGd4BhhguW+XYRTf+mSk8n8FDZgmwxSvV 6ePZGKt1pa82rJ2M+Q5JP6fSAxsu+8IwjmGgpZQEo4nlTPv1bkxxY7lOXo+WEoZklO22 Oj7a1AElvxqiXJ6i49h3zi5xNgx6ZP7LtW5r7tQ7Q/LUnnPoszlagCrtADLcHuHwAVja gK1h9Mw3skWPCQc4rtugnk2tG/jwxbjmDRaRKeq7lSjtqdmJnavsKvsHP+9LmfNWlBDL OF1QQ+NdAAWPDlVQBI2G4QdGOWLKigUhRbnrGl6Cf+PWdUMPtlYRo0nDQSbCEFyieMSO +RIg== X-Received: by 10.194.82.104 with SMTP id h8mr42796067wjy.3.1366585553135; Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ek4sm16749164wib.11.2013.04.21.16.05.51 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6CDF01C21A0B; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 01:05:51 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Aur=E9lien?= Aptel"'s message of "Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:53:22 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159096 Archived-At: Hi Aurélien, Aurélien Aptel writes: > I completely understand. I took a *long* pause after it and I kind of > let you down, sorry. Well, no harm at all, as I told you I realized that my expectations were perhaps a bit too idealistic -- it's just normal to take a break, and there was no let down, I was just wondering what I could have done to keep you (and other GSoC-ers) in the loop. > I was (and still am) not satisfied with the > design of org-sync and was reluctant to work more on it. But now that > I have more time I actually started to work again on it. I'll talk > about it more with you off-list. Please do! >> It's fine, because obviously there is no obligation here, and maybe >> I was a bit naive about this -- I had this picture that finally we'll >> work as a close team with all those new GSoC students (3 just for Org!) > > I'm sorry you felt "used", it was definitely not my intention :) > On the other hand, the gsoc made me more confident and Emacs did gain > a new (albeit very small) contributor ! Yes, hence my reiterated encouragements for this next GSoC, after all, this is a learning process! Best, -- Bastien