From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Williams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eww Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 08:39:10 +1100 Message-ID: <87txj7srgh.fsf@otago.ac.nz> References: <87ehad4o63.fsf@otago.ac.nz> <87haf9aqor.fsf@otago.ac.nz> <878v0k5385.fsf@otago.ac.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375479574 27552 80.91.229.3 (2 Aug 2013 21:39:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 21:39:34 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 02 23:39:37 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V5N4T-00085h-Bn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 23:39:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46701 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V5N4S-0004qR-Uu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:39:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33737) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V5N4K-0004iK-TF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:39:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V5N4G-00038N-0Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:39:28 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V5N4F-00034v-Pl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:39:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V5N4D-0007PS-0E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 23:39:21 +0200 Original-Received: from h091147010202.ys.dsl.sakhalin.ru ([91.147.10.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 23:39:20 +0200 Original-Received: from john.williams by h091147010202.ys.dsl.sakhalin.ru with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 23:39:20 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 45 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: h091147010202.ys.dsl.sakhalin.ru User-Agent: Gnus/5.110017 (No Gnus v0.17) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VqpMQDP1XJ4hOBjk+Wjf7KDz0MU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162395 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > John Williams writes: > >> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> >>> John Williams writes: >>> >>>> But when I say "M-x eww RET http://www.gnu.org RET" I get a totally >>>> blank buffer. >>> >>> I don't get a blank buffer. Have you compiled your Emacs with libxml >>> support? >> Yes, AFAICT. > > [...] > >> Does Emacs use -lxml2? yes > > Hm. So that should be OK, then. And since it pops you to the eww > buffer, then it means that it got a response. > > You just get a blank buffer? No error messages? `(setq debug-on-error t)' > gives you no backtrace? Nope, nothing. Here is the entire contents of the *Messages* buffer after stating a new session and immediately saying `M-x eww RET RET', i.e. visiting "https://duckduckgo.com/html/?q=" : ------------------- Loading /home/john/.recentf...done Could not deduce mode name from keymap name [8 times] For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Package assoc is obsolete! Contacting host: duckduckgo.com:443 gnutls.c: [1] Note that the security level of the Diffie-Hellman key exchange has been lowered to 256 bits and this may allow decryption of the session data ------------------- Is the message about assoc being obsolete relevant? Lars, thank you so much for your help. I know how busy you are and I really apreciate you taking the time to help me! Cheers, John