From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add GPG compatible symmetric encryption command Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:15:41 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87txcbawsi.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <8761orch7y.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ppmzw1p8.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391778970 23984 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2014 13:16:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:16:10 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 07 14:16:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBlHz-0004bk-0x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:16:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41574 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBlHy-00054v-Il for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:16:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44485) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBlHp-0004x9-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:16:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBlHj-0000lU-Oo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:16:05 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBlHj-0000lP-J3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:15:59 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBlHa-0004FY-KA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:15:50 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:15:50 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:15:50 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9JDPVFzEPD2DRR8hXNdWH9s7wuc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169462 Archived-At: On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 21:24:03 +0900 Daiki Ueno wrote: DU> All your claims look like: DU> - is useful to implement DU> and there's no mention of how would be beneficial DU> to Emacs. As I said, I'm sorry you don't find them convincing. Meanwhile, would you consider continuing with your patch to the point where Lars can use it from Gnus? As I said, I don't think it affects my request for GnuTLS/libnettle/libhogweed primitives[1] and it would help Lars avoid having to use an ELisp implementation of Rijndael/AES. I certainly would like a unified (via EPG) interface, instead of inventing a new one. If you're not interested in continuing, I can pick it up (either as an EPG change or a standalone library), unless you have objections to that. Thanks Ted [1] you omitted an answer to that question from your reply, so I assume you agree.