From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:38:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87txbjivxc.fsf@yandex.ru> References: <53064BD0.7070009@yandex.ru> <87ha7tr5bo.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ppmhecd8.fsf@yandex.ru> <87y50z90pd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87txbn8r6x.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8338j717oe.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjlf6tdx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83sir7yue7.fsf@gnu.org> <8761o3dlak.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83bnxuzyl4.fsf@gnu.org> <871tyqes5q.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87a9ddg7o8.fsf@engster.org> <87d2i9ee8t.fsf@engster.org> <874n3ke1qn.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393569520 15131 80.91.229.3 (28 Feb 2014 06:38:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, john@yates-sheets.org, David Engster , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 28 07:38:48 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJH5s-0005Vz-5R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:38:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49496 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJH5r-0005Mk-J3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:38:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51166) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJH5k-0005Me-C2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:38:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJH5f-000239-2O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:38:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ea0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::234]:55039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJH5e-000232-Pj; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 01:38:34 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ea0-f180.google.com with SMTP id m10so2403688eaj.11 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:38:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=e4we/92afcPJ0ipVDIzsWSLZaJ8w7Oe9UmsYZNYbiZQ=; b=XCB+juoGEUHVzyAkCitHAyVmMtarp77SC13qxnLP1UtmNJz8P3sMe4rLdgQ7pctOq7 bcjUJmescf7SN3dmDuGkCfZH3N0wwJTeWV026oVvOgcZwhwPY0/wC9dOc0dJDvJiXXap lojvBjGTrG6wkLlgXGYBc045scBs4SvRJ32LgcISwUGfYmdcvb8JTvyLxfz/WTGiWroa nUzsHUEAxEVWHZrlR1s5qdZyajw/pAnP/q4n/CVk2Lwi53+spZi1Es13BguunmEixLwf m8msI4VC5PU3JclfBfhBE7fVHXsRxc3n+rMXCn+rMAcu8PbL8XupyRv1KycTFWBPUttv zV1w== X-Received: by 10.15.44.202 with SMTP id z50mr18782497eev.81.1393569513506; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:38:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from axl ([93.109.195.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 46sm6587106ees.4.2014.02.27.22.38.30 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:38:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2014 23:37:09 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4013:c01::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169919 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > or ELPA that uses clang or LLVM. ^^^^^^^ This ship has sailed. > You can use CEDET, you can use GCC, you can use both, or you > can use something else. But not clang or LLVM. I think this conflicts with your previous statement that using Clang for some features would be fine as long as Emacs supports using GCC for the same features.