From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:29:04 -0400 Message-ID: <87tx1wmc4f.fsf@moondust.localdomain> References: <85a93pj1n5.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <8761ecilmh.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8761ecnsmu.fsf@moondust.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416346175 30350 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2014 21:29:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:29:35 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 18 22:29:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqqL2-0001NG-TD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:29:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55473 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqqL2-0005PG-HQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:29:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41039) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqqKv-0005OI-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:29:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqqKp-0004Vt-6w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:29:21 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqqKo-0004Vh-WB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:29:15 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqqKo-0001Gn-AT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:29:14 +0100 Original-Received: from t87b9.wpa.dal.ca ([134.190.135.185]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:29:14 +0100 Original-Received: from nljlistbox2 by t87b9.wpa.dal.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:29:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: t87b9.wpa.dal.ca User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:oQ5STCDLRpMEdbmf6ThLlD+bTQc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177667 Archived-At: At 17:07 -0400 on Tuesday 2014-11-18, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) writes: > >> At 11:40 -0400 on Tuesday 2014-11-18, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> >>> Does anybody know of https sites with interesting types of >>> un-verifiable certificates so that I can test? Self-signed or expired >>> certificates would be nice... >> >> The Parabola GNU/Linux-libre site at https://www.parabola.nu/ > > Looks like a valid certificate? Yes, it is. It's only interesting because Firefox, Chrome, and IE are all reluctant to allow one to view that site because the certificate is not from a well-known authority. Sounds like nsm correctly allows it. :)