From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:43:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87twqvu7b6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <55F5DD8C.70506@dancol.org> <55F62C16.4000105@dancol.org> <55F64F04.9030002@dancol.org> <55F6E43E.9030502@dancol.org> <8737ygz8z3.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <55F789D5.3080005@dancol.org> <87zj0oxflr.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k2rsul36.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <55F81AC2.2080102@dancol.org> <8737yfvmch.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <55F81F96.9050900@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442328313 12919 80.91.229.3 (15 Sep 2015 14:45:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , Emacs development discussions , Philipp Stephani , Stefan Monnier , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien?= Aptel , "Stephen J. Turnbull" , Tom Tromey , Stephen Leake To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 15 16:45:06 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbrTf-0000IT-1h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:44:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43452 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbrTe-0007GY-Bg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:44:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbrQ0-0001Vf-8O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:41:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbrPw-0004fL-7S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:41:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbrPQ-0004PE-3Y; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:40:36 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37843 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbrPP-0007ab-1L; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:40:35 -0400 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 63359E0897; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:43:25 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <55F81F96.9050900@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Tue, 15 Sep 2015 06:39:34 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189978 Archived-At: Daniel Colascione writes: > On 09/15/2015 06:33 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >> Daniel Colascione writes: >> >>> On 09/15/2015 01:45 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >>>> So having our binary interfaces and calling conventions and >>>> memory/exception handling default to "like Emacs does" is not just >>>> Lisp-friendly but is also keeping our license enforcement options more >>>> conservative. >>> >>> I don't see how. >> >> Maybe you should have read more than a single paragraph then. > > Maybe you shouldn't snip the part where I explain how the rest of your > argument is incorrect. Your "explanation" did not fit the "rest of my argument" and discussed a different scenario. -- David Kastrup