From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:06:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87tw7wh9sf.fsf@mbork.pl> References: <87o9ydrzkr.fsf@mbork.pl> <87mvdriuss.fsf@mbork.pl> <87bmu6icea.fsf@mbork.pl> <87wpctgieu.fsf@mbork.pl> <52e67f43-edcf-09e3-5fd6-6079763fd234@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487099248 15089 195.159.176.226 (14 Feb 2017 19:07:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 19:07:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50.3 Cc: John Wiegley , 21072@debbugs.gnu.org, Emacs developers To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 14 20:07:24 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdiRd-0003Wx-S8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:07:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36675 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdiRj-0000Lx-KJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:07:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdiQJ-00085A-Ab for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:06:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdiQF-0004xX-6g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:05:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:51730) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdiQE-0004v1-V3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:05:55 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C53DE6A6D; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:05:51 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D7rzFLsxZLrL; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:05:48 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (static-dwadziewiec-jedenpiec7.echostar.pl [109.232.29.157]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C273E6A39; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 20:05:47 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: <52e67f43-edcf-09e3-5fd6-6079763fd234@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.110.48.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212382 Archived-At: On 2017-02-14, at 14:02, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 14.02.2017 12:45, Marcin Borkowski wrote: >> +(defun in-comment-line-p () > > This needs a different name. > > Something like beginning-of-defun--in-comment-line-p might be a good choice. Why? It seems to me that it may be of general use. Best, -- Marcin Borkowski