From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs project mission (was Re: "If you're still seeing problems, please reopen." [ Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 17:51:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87tv6pcleq.fsf@gnus.org> References: <20191117113054.49837.qmail@mail.muc.de> <87sgmjyn60.fsf@gmx.de> <87imnezyt5.fsf@gmx.de> <481a1f16-d661-0f96-2f45-3d5ec9c1132e@yandex.ru> <871ru0t7p8.fsf@gnus.org> <7a7f8955-ec5f-4e1e-b258-19379588516a@default> <86sgmftq1m.fsf@zoho.eu> <87a78k8mka.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <868so4bdsi.fsf@zoho.eu> <8736e9h7m1.fsf@gnus.org> <835zj5qpgl.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2w1cn14.fsf@gnus.org> <831rttqo6j.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="265225"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: moasenwood@zoho.eu, rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 27 17:53:52 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ia0ZZ-0016nX-Oi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 17:53:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40398 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ia0ZY-0002C1-Bl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:53:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ia0Xh-0001lL-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:51:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ia0Xf-0000FM-T8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:51:52 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:46876) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ia0Xf-0000A8-KI; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:51:51 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ia0XW-0003ZK-Gk; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 17:51:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <831rttqo6j.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:28:04 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242803 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Sounds like we will gradually remove every detail of the bug report. > Why not remove the command entirely, then? Let's release Emacs 27 > without it. I don't think that's a very constructive response. You obviously thought that Emacs didn't include the "recent messages" bit now, by which I can only assume that you, like me, never look at that portion of the bug reports. So we've already established that it has zero utility, so why should we include that particular very problematic (from a privacy standpoint) part in the bug reports? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no