From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adam Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master a6b5985: Avoid duplicated character classes in rx Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 22:20:52 -0600 Message-ID: <87tv68stej.fsf@alphapapa.net> References: <20191203142243.9552.27513@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20191203142246.0615C20A2B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <79A83C7D-610F-4CA4-B5E9-7F11FD8A9365@acm.org> <87y2vksvut.fsf@alphapapa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="209714"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 10 05:21:47 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ieX1v-000sRV-0L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 05:21:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50200 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ieX1t-0001Ke-Ha for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 23:21:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59917) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ieX1E-0001KV-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 23:21:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ieX1D-0001qW-PJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 23:21:04 -0500 Original-Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226]:56470 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ieX1D-0001px-Ib for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 23:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ieX1B-000rgy-5P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 05:21:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:243273 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> There are hundreds of thousands, probably millions, of lines of Elisp in >> third-party packages and user configurations in the world. Removing the >> return value of `push' would be a breaking change affecting innumerable >> users. > > That's called a straw man argument: no one suggested "removing the > return value". In this case, then, not a strawman but a misunderstanding of what was being proposed. I thought the return value was being argued against rather than merely the usage of it. I'm glad to find that I misunderstood. Apologies for the noise. :)