From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eww and bookmarks Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:26:48 -0500 Message-ID: <87tuug6b5z.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87k1163jz5.fsf@gmail.com> <87tv0a5k5b.fsf@web.de> <87mu5ec3pf.fsf@web.de> <87mu5e3ncg.fsf@tcd.ie> <87tuzlwrdv.fsf@web.de> <87bllt1olu.fsf@tcd.ie> <878sgvi0pp.fsf@web.de> <87r1pkj1l3.fsf@alphapapa.net> Reply-To: Karl Fogel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40039"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Adam Porter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 26 20:32:28 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kX8EG-000AH5-GP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 20:32:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51214 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kX8EF-0000Xn-Er for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:32:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kX88s-0002cv-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:26:54 -0400 Original-Received: from newsp.red-bean.com ([45.79.25.59]:34566 helo=sanpietro.red-bean.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kX88p-00012A-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:26:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=red-bean.com; s=202005newsp; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=/3/G+5zwRyA/SILHYsaAth4kmQjSzOVAsUtdBJFVI2A=; t=1603740410; x=1604950010; b=ju5QtRZfEs+42Ts9JEl45NXpvewJQOz66OAmzNNDoINa6ckAw+IAC7fTIHeBtKdVaQ/qP97GW+ qusLMkg/1buNy20bGeyihHcQa3ycVPjj5AOB8Q5BWze7jHrBtNB7PnwD1sX2PpT6e3fyEQzLDzmj1 6aRHIA81hhPFZ//P1wtuoHstQhnjzcGSrhmYuvb4+tq9DkEtW7xuO9V0fmkFCn5QuZZhKbG41ZdrD ZdaOb0HoCR9wALT0ds5JreVtupvDohLkVKl7bPiBsJcxkyilceT5gfGF3YyNmVQUIvx+kJP5w8PWp azYVrZJ4LFVv11UxM2kZEN6dxpIlZl8x8lVEw==; Original-Received: from 99-112-125-163.lightspeed.cicril.sbcglobal.net ([99.112.125.163]:47010 helo=floss) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kX88n-0008QZ-K7; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 19:26:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <87r1pkj1l3.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:15:20 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.79.25.59; envelope-from=kfogel@red-bean.com; helo=sanpietro.red-bean.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/26 15:26:49 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258472 Archived-At: On 26 Oct 2020, Adam Porter wrote: >Hi, > >Having recently put together a new package that uses bookmarks to >restore windows and buffers, Burly[0], I tested bookmarks with EWW >buffers, expecting them to be bookmarkable with Emacs bookmarks, but I >found that they aren't. Then I found this thread[1] from June about >Michael's patch, which sounds great, but it doesn't seem to have been >applied yet. > >Is there any chance it can make it into Emacs 28? It seems a shame for >EWW buffers to not work with Emacs's own bookmark system. > >Thanks to Michael, et al for your work on this patch. > >0: https://github.com/alphapapa/burly.el >1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-06/msg00364.html (+1 to the "Thanks to Michael" there!) >From what I see of the thread, Michael's patch doesn't seem ready to apply yet. The most recent version is in this message... https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-06/msg00304.html From: Michael Heerdegen Subject: Re: eww and bookmarks To: Emacs Devel Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 17:09:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87mu5ec3pf.fsf@web.de> ...but in that message he refers to some problems it still has. There is followup discussion in the thread in which he mentions further improvements, but no revised patch as far as I can see. So currently I'm not sure what patch we would review. Michael, if you have a newest & working version, please post. (Or if you already have posted it, then please let me know. The way I searched was by looking at every subsequent post from you, in that thread, since the above message.) Best regards, -Karl