From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [GNU ELPA] New package proposal: aggressive-completion.el Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 15:43:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87tuonwk8b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o8evok58.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2dza8g5.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18637"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.5.11; emacs 28.0.50 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 03 15:51:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lSgg6-0004mc-CT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 15:51:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46660 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSgg5-0002B9-Et for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 09:51:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSgfV-0001fG-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 09:50:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSgfT-0004PG-9X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 09:50:28 -0400 Original-Received: from auth1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.227]:45929) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lSgfI-0006wV-Ub for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2021 09:50:23 -0400 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9583427C0054 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 09:50:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 03 Apr 2021 09:50:15 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeikedgjeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpehffgfhvffuffgjkfggtgesthdtre dttdertdenucfhrhhomhepvfgrshhsihhlohcujfhorhhnuceothhsughhsehgnhhurdho rhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevveeikeetkeeviefgfeffiedvteeguddvffeuue duveegtddthedvhfeuveffhfenucfkphepkeejrdduieefrdefuddrudehgeenucevlhhu shhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhorhhnodhmvg hsmhhtphgruhhthhhpvghrshhonhgrlhhithihqdekieejfeekjeekgedqieefhedvleek qdhtshguhheppehgnhhurdhorhhgsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhm X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (p57a31f9a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.163.31.154]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 119CB24005E for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2021 09:50:14 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <87y2dza8g5.fsf@posteo.net> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267348 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: Hi Philip, > Just tried out the package, and it seems to work very well! I just > have two annoyances: > > 1. Where there are too many options, lag is noticeable (eg. with C-h o). There's a knob for that: `aggressive-completion-max-shown-completions'. > 2. The completion buffer keeps appearing and disappearing, shrinking > and growing. The *Completions* buffer should appear as soon as there is at least one and at most `aggressive-completion-max-shown-completions' completions, and it'll disappear when completion selected a unique match. Do you see something different? Wrt. the resizing: that's the standard completion help behavior you'd also see when double-TAB-ing during completion. Not sure if there's a way to restrict that window's height. Bye, Tassilo