From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Contradictiory directions Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:48:01 +0800 Message-ID: <87tufas40e.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <20211211035614.15517.53830@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20211211035616.984DD20A0A@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87ee6j4ty4.fsf@yahoo.com> <8735mz4o70.fsf@yahoo.com> <83k0gbr0dm.fsf@gnu.org> <87y24r33bn.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ilvu1ldh.fsf@yahoo.com> <87a6h5tap6.fsf@gnus.org> <87tufbu7jg.fsf@yahoo.com> <87y24nr6nk.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf0ntz0t.fsf@yahoo.com> <87wnk6mjlm.fsf@gnus.org> <877dc6tjz0.fsf_-_@yahoo.com> <87k0g6mivu.fsf@gnus.org> <87y24ms4jj.fsf@yahoo.com> <87fsqumi16.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16067"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cc: Richard Stallman , eliz@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 15 09:13:04 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxPPM-0003zk-8q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 09:13:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51952 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxPPL-0005N8-7L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 03:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxP1K-0000LB-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 02:48:14 -0500 Original-Received: from sonic315-22.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.190.148]:45605) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxP1H-0001oA-OJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 02:48:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1639554490; bh=alVF3YrbfTtRtDzg/ysxcHLJaggddRbtzUWQQiVitYw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=LucTOHBwDNgDW+7YWjcq3VadMBAltjpEpvXWH3NIaSaoQ9Py1vt8xhpGtwnbqI45GZiOoSW+BShGUIPSNJRXdOC06bgyxfFfhQFdw5VQnJqSmFn7ftQMW8SyLxpPRNC6U79h5R199i79Dscgl4LR5+EYAxJEktxmlz6UYp05CPzkoP920l/WAm5KY8OiHa9i5AN/Lnf2BrA9uO1T5hbGP+GEN+m1Qfx2i8osYeoFbHBZ4w+TOQ2axfsuBYvSGiSczx1Jt+ERJeeSqRUtw9Kg/WrAv8CZaRTVEikqgueq+dwHi5gtQHyGjOi9KkfmdS3XJsy6upqgxWJ12l65sRxpPQ== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1639554490; bh=4vQT075OSWMx70F3xprer7gOcngpTEN8i7fhOozSHx5=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=Q8fzY8AckXesl5zM3n/5lEeX84xvf2DybdXFzekyIgy4LvwDajYVWuyjwtpZT8SDM2BhUR2LNb9aOXIk1kv0wetBl6lb5zCrVlLXahJRn5G24r1HTYH7lxZzJPfITETuU0wavNIw5J/EGVaBRq8Q+tjP3F7bIHD5m+TOvww8VZXo9u9SaTLs1I29eHYIGykjnEb3s9fqcTjbCkm3PyV2MQJFKruvA3jF8M2zFC5bdXH67c5s52hQjE2ceYCWOBwswfYLJQXqhkR2ScO140jzgSAikluhcywvv6wXNT2NVov7UFAjFPmeCxyTD/baGskCIwd8vaaU4dXgdj3eWuVRdQ== X-YMail-OSG: YjNPhvQVM1mvwjh_nN6brOzhxrs6KfVPegthiMH42j7EO.zRDjtUU2uLHXl4U.C PuiOWCEq20KwXpMrkBWvxVtca6OLTCg98ljqfLTzr5ygu3yoK1GyIXLO3cWcXB.7Yzg33_zlz9Uz gL_p5lC4PLLrePXW97NWg2DHYdRyr96GuMN8QBRnxLk1U7J9kcTUr8.QQuF3K.faqf2ZWagrxry9 oDOVRpPnauKwMcgf4H1c1Lz3WWJO2VEwJgJIB2YBSNVFMfAdQZYQAXQn4VUec.SRFkn9cKFW1UpR xBoqfj66gx6AP1MLm2cnkCOxPjqQKFHChs13UaGFJB875uplrg1OaewHvUfwwtz8gT0Xuyo0VBaz Zrg4A7hDZMn_1vSvpJtlS0zOJQ7CJ1HOFDyWTReFDmFxrOGr8P2zBeqEw21A5TxGDARHQvLV4iKg C_7yPxGm_7aW8RmqtDwXmp4Q2fuOU8XdiotxO2FoWU7hnh6OnxKS5zkVFJ.JxJRXIHIYnghI96NR d5SQgu5SGetJPGux7lETXOgpGVNi_PZ8gsXZylEGx.yzlSgU_vxshIO4SNwHHrJz2JHkyDu1M13r Ci8M1MmpREvfo8DsT.UneRhVLnO3VTcQ8MmTKFxbl66CO_lsciUkNMd0letv7ovUZic2WjB70Ncn rfKpjEtMqiXxbdvNeqNsjHcgu7LicWkpoREZUhuK_Q4mz668qXVEUU1e0AyO3WL6nwPdX_OE4oqU jV.rcKrhDC1iPNufpXnyBrooBEB_7_2tsI.jv51ZnykxC1ak5YMC1H4ULMnWJe3e1CiPvHiSFFmY tqOHk8GjXP7Zz5UnOpvKqHeP0Dv2.dfQKNPVdbP.3u X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic315.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 07:48:10 +0000 Original-Received: by kubenode515.mail-prod1.omega.sg3.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 6ce62233ecd86792345de4ded82f34d7; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 07:48:05 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87fsqumi16.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 15 Dec 2021 08:41:41 +0100") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.19415 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.163.190.148; envelope-from=luangruo@yahoo.com; helo=sonic315-22.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:281983 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > It is impossible to disallow such a thing, so I'm not sure what your > point is. It's bad to distribute a version of Emacs capable of such a thing. Users are of course free to do whatever they want with their copies, but we are morally and legally responsible for the versions of Emacs that we distribute. glibc (and hence, LD_PRELOAD) is special in this regard: it is a system library. There is a detailed explanation somewhere I don't recall anymore, but there is a simplified version here: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html. >> If so, it is certainly a standard I don't know about. In nearly three >> decades, I've heard many variants of "list", but never "allowlist" or >> "blocklist". Can we agree to use the terminology that everyone knows >> about in Emacs, to keep the situation simple? > Seems simple enough to me. So we agree to use the existing terms "whitelist" and "blacklist" then? LGTM, thanks!