From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aleksandr Vityazev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package devicetree-ts-mode Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:08:20 +0300 Message-ID: <87ttnd3dl7.fsf@disroot.org> References: <8734uy3yeq.fsf@disroot.org> <877ck9hkdg.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1cp3hk0.fsf@disroot.org> <87ttndg2gu.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10196"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Kangas To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 16 12:57:45 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rPi4e-0002Mf-Us for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 12:57:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPi3n-0005Kn-Ul; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 06:56:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPeUn-0007uF-VL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 03:08:29 -0500 Original-Received: from layka.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPeUk-00018i-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 03:08:28 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617F741647; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 09:08:24 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Original-Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xUkXCwM_s70D; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 09:08:23 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1705392503; bh=BYWriNr/68r4y25hx1mNOoIpi3y8W/znDBTQCvwoh1E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=gS/JelFbGwQIdSxMVx78FJyxUR3tKba8nVbY09LtPnqsfvOhdGp9m55R4GX78eWsF oD0+/6P59RZd601/UW1CkwoUsqf7XkyzGWqGmGUQSSCs3M25fwDiMdmkvazBNdDO8p GCWCS+MN8LidMgvjQlMGfi3kZO+72lD6ddoIcM9no6RBrCdTSAPIcjZLc2ybgg/BmZ RFnlFCwE73Y2gfJyCQZhi52RWm+E+3I3QB++xCUZo1n3tjbbz8eC4iErQ190kzAqnd 5xLuWQD2OBtvYaeqWxuX5vzslN2cyPl3o/L/ve4ax5RYU6KDAkvcskPyg/d64uxMlX TbH24cBXZOMLw== In-Reply-To: <87ttndg2gu.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Tue, 16 Jan 2024 07:30:09 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=avityazev@disroot.org; helo=layka.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 06:56:48 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:315013 Archived-At: On 2024-01-16 07:30, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > Aleksandr Vityazev writes: > >> On 2024-01-16 06:18, Philip Kaludercic wrote: >> >>> Aleksandr Vityazev writes: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Since the previous thread [1] got lost over time and no more replies, >>>> I'm starting a new one. >>> >>> Sorry about that, I hadn't gotten around to answering your last ping. >>> >>>> All of Philip's suggested points have been fixed, is there any reason >>>> why this package should not be included in ELPA? I am willing to listen >>>> and fix if possible. >>> >>> I think code-wise everything should be fine. Just to be sure, you have >>> signed the FSF CA and are familiar with how the ELPA build server works >>> (at least from a package developer perspective)? >>> >> >> Yes, I have a signed CA FSF. One of my packages is already in ELPA, so I'm more >> or less familiar with the build process. > > OK, great, I have tried building the package and it works. The package > has been added to the archive and should appear soon enough. > > Another tip I can give you is that since you have a mailing list on > Soucehut, I recommend adding that is the maintainer address in the > package header. Thanks, I'll add the mailing list address to the package header. > > Also, is it necessary to distribute both the README.md and README.org in > the package tarball? I would assume the former is for Sourcehut, > right? Yes, README.md for Sourcehut. I prefer to write README in org format. It is possible to do this by generating html from README.org and adding it as a custom one. In this case, only README.org can be kept. Maybe I'll switch to this method later. At the moment I can add one of the READMEs to elpaignore if necessary. >>>> Link to repository - https://git.sr.ht/~akagi/devicetree-ts-mode/ >>>> >>>> [1] https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2023-12/msg00629.html -- Best regards, Aleksandr Vityazev