From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Joseph Turner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unexpected behavior of format-number with format-prompt Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 20:26:34 -0800 Message-ID: <87ttc7x0qt.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> References: <875xp0b00l.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> <86h68jqyut.fsf@gnu.org> <3CD02C22-984C-42F7-AAE8-ECD413168503@breatheoutbreathe.in> <86fro3qxvj.fsf@gnu.org> <87msi86wrp.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> <861pzekyl8.fsf@gnu.org> <87r07dz7ug.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> <86frnsiso9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21091"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 16 08:13:44 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tCD03-0005MD-KN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 08:13:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tCCzB-0007Ok-4C; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:12:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tCAOR-0000h5-8F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:26:43 -0500 Original-Received: from out-178.mta0.migadu.com ([91.218.175.178]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tCAOP-0001XY-V3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:26:43 -0500 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=breatheoutbreathe.in; s=key1; t=1731731199; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0zeEyuarwE96UITwNYxt1Mkzguux0rP8KJrPziEyTlM=; b=cDT+kTA/GM92MBZhLsE0q0xlXE9ShfQWXFU7JdtUsKPkzXLVWArbDdTfQMTQXNswoTNO6l kTBnS/6KHV2tGxiUi3oWsbnoJhIB8OidLEVx0Swy5fIyQVz1ceK0UyA66yRdp3kSKw0y3D EjdFTUvpAruLp+j+Rcb9x+3yXLnbgP4= In-Reply-To: <86frnsiso9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:32:22 +0200") X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Received-SPF: pass client-ip=91.218.175.178; envelope-from=joseph@breatheoutbreathe.in; helo=out-178.mta0.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 02:12:37 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325471 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Joseph Turner >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 15:57:59 -0800 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> From: Joseph Turner >> >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 11:18:50 -0800 >> >> >> >> > I think this change should be in the doc string of read-number, not in >> >> > the manual. One reason is that read-number is not documented in the >> >> > manual, while the description of this nit logically belongs to it, not >> >> > to format-prompt. >> >> >> >> I agree. How about this? >> > >> > LGTM, please install on the emacs-30 release branch. >> >> I'd be happy to. Would it be appropriate for me to have permissions to >> push to Savannah? > > Sorry, I thought you had write permissions. I've now installed the > patch on the emacs-30 branch. Thank you! Joseph