Sebastián Monía <sebastian@sebasmonia.com> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2024, at 11:52 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
>> On 12/1/2024 2:12 PM, Sebastián Monía wrote:
>> > Generalizing this feature can be challenging in that different types of
>> > information could need very different handing.
>> 
>> I think in this case, I'll defer to you and Adam (and Eli) about the 
>> best path forward here. The existing behavior is a bit odd, and since I 
>> don't use EWW's bookmarks, I don't have a good sense of the right way to 
>> improve things here. Or in other words, I don't have any objections to 
>> the code, but I'm not confident that I know enough about this corner to 
>> do a properly thorough review.
>
> Will submit a patch ASAP to include a column "Order".

> And then we don't need a "remove sort" binding.

Hi all,
Attached a patch with "Order" and validation for this sort before
kill/yank.
As always, open to feedback.

@Adam, apparently reverting the vtable re-generates all objects, when
using a function (as is our case here). So we can't use
`vtable-goto-object' unless the change from eq to equal is applied
first. Sad indeed.