From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: comint-carriage-motion causes severe problems.
Date: 05 Jul 2002 03:21:12 +0900
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <87sn2zfj6v.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp>
References: <200207020035.TAA19789@eel.dms.auburn.edu>
	<buou1nisymc.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<vaf4rfisf4j.fsf@INBOX.auto.emacs.devel.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<buo65zysej1.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<200207021534.g62FYao17897@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<200207021618.LAA20219@eel.dms.auburn.edu>
	<200207032057.g63KvX604721@aztec.santafe.edu>
	<200207032111.g63LBAv25925@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<200207040118.UAA22469@eel.dms.auburn.edu>
	<200207041543.g64FhEb29778@rum.cs.yale.edu>
	<200207041656.LAA22736@eel.dms.auburn.edu>
	<200207041704.g64H4fU30311@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Reply-To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025808014 18195 127.0.0.1 (4 Jul 2002 18:40:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 18:40:14 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>, rms@gnu.org,
	Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17QBWY-0004jL-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 20:40:14 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 17QBcf-0007in-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 20:46:33 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17QBGx-0005Wk-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 14:24:07 -0400
Original-Received: from smtp02.fields.gol.com ([203.216.5.132])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 17QBEL-0005Km-00; Thu, 04 Jul 2002 14:21:25 -0400
Original-Received: from tc-2-189.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.25.189] helo=tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp)
	by smtp02.fields.gol.com with esmtp (Magnetic Fields)
	id 17QBED-0005Y8-00; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 03:21:17 +0900
Original-Received: by tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 798663076; Fri,  5 Jul 2002 03:21:12 +0900 (JST)
Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>
System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu
In-Reply-To: <200207041704.g64H4fU30311@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Original-Lines: 16
X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:5469
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:5469

"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu> writes:
> Global customizations normally occur before buffers are created, so
> before the (remove-hook 'foo 'bar 'local) has even a chance of being run.

Yes but as Kai noted `normally' isn't `always'.

It seems simpler and less likely to cause surprises to just always add
(not . FOO) if FOO isn't in the local hook, even if there's no FOO in
the global hook either -- what would be the disadvantage of that?

[of course, doing a local `add-hook' of FOO should remove the (not . FOO)!]

-Miles
-- 
`There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
 Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.'