From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexander Pohoyda Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug Date: 22 Oct 2003 19:19:15 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87smllb370.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> References: <200310121947.h9CJlhKH006102@oak.pohoyda.family> <6480-Thu16Oct2003192118+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <3405-Thu16Oct2003205828+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <9003-Fri17Oct2003082402+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <87fzhsnkp1.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <1438-Fri17Oct2003201054+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <87ismj70d2.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1066843291 26265 80.91.224.253 (22 Oct 2003 17:21:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 22 19:21:28 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ACMfo-0000YT-00 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:21:28 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ACMfn-0007GG-01 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:21:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ACMea-0002t1-Kl for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:20:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ACMeI-0002ro-Bx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:19:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ACMdl-0002kM-Vm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:19:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ACMdl-0002jN-5H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:19:21 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 14605 invoked by uid 65534); 22 Oct 2003 17:19:16 -0000 Original-Received: from p508BD28C.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO oak.pohoyda.family) (80.139.210.140) by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 22 Oct 2003 19:19:16 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14602519 Original-Received: from oak.pohoyda.family (oak.pohoyda.family [127.0.0.1]) by oak.pohoyda.family (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9MHJFgC001222; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:19:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net) Original-Received: (from apog@localhost) by oak.pohoyda.family (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h9MHJF2I001219; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:19:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.pohoyda.family: apog set sender to alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net using -f Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17351 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17351 Richard Stallman writes: > Now we have the option of using SEMI or adopting the Gnus code. To > make that decision, someone who knows Emacs Lisp well and is not > already a partisan of either one should study them both and compare > them. Is there someone who would like to do that? Where can I get SEMI? -- Alexander Pohoyda PGP Key fingerprint: 7F C9 CC 5A 75 CD 89 72 15 54 5F 62 20 23 C6 44