From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Updating release version to 22.1 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:33:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87sm44oxiq.fsf@marant.org> References: <87vf92sqby.fsf@marant.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108075570 18056 80.91.229.2 (10 Feb 2005 22:46:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:46:10 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 10 23:46:10 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CzN4T-00082Q-6y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:46:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CzNJH-0001wt-S6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:01:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CzNFl-0000Jk-Vu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:57:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CzNFg-0000GQ-GG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:57:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CzNFf-0000DL-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:57:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.228.0.62] (helo=postfix4-1.free.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CzMtJ-0007A8-5A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:34:29 -0500 Original-Received: from amboise (unknown [82.227.97.206]) by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED90628C3AF for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:34:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by amboise (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C0752C03E; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:33:50 +0100 (CET) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:49:24 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33220 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33220 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > Choosing a new numbering scheme has been discussed for years now, > without making any decisions on what to do. > > So for the moment, I simply decided to use 22.0.50 for the CVS version > as this is in accordance with the current numbering scheme, and all > the relevant code assumes this convention. > > Adapting to whatever new scheme you decide to use will be trivial. But would probably require a dedicated version comparision algorithm to be implemented, which is a complete waste of time. Almost everyone agreed with using 22.0 because it is obviously simple and sane. Why trying to make things more complicated through a non-democratic decision? Cheers, --=20 J=E9r=F4me Marant