From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lute Kamstra Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: DONTCOMPILE in lisp/Makefile.in doesn't work. Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:54:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87sm1wzaz7.fsf@xs4all.nl> References: <873btxmjiz.fsf@xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113294983 5803 80.91.229.2 (12 Apr 2005 08:36:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 10:36:21 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLGsA-000178-2Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:35:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLGSQ-0007bU-Tr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:09:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLFup-0004Aq-Sm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 03:34:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLFul-00048A-Np for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 03:34:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLFqz-0003Pn-28 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 03:30:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [194.109.24.33] (helo=smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DLGE9-0004cc-SY; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 03:54:30 -0400 Original-Received: from pijl (a80-127-67-124.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.67.124]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3C7sK8T087268; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:54:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Lute.Kamstra@xs4all.nl) Original-Received: from lute by pijl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DLGE0-00013G-00; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:54:20 +0200 Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:59:31 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Original-Lines: 13 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35892 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35892 Richard Stallman writes: > Isn't it better to just do away with DONTCOMPILE and just rely on lisp > files setting no-byte-compile? > > I think so. It would be simpler to use just one mechanism, > and no-byte-compile is cleaner. Could you please do that, > and put no-byte-compile into any files which could use it and > don't have it? I'll do that. Lute.