From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: thumbs.el and transparency Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 03:21:57 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87slqqfwgh.fsf@jurta.org> References: <17366.53124.274532.548329@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <878xspwnjm.fsf@jurta.org> <87slqvfobk.fsf@jurta.org> <87d5hy43b6.fsf@jurta.org> <87u0b8lwhw.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139630501 2783 80.91.229.2 (11 Feb 2006 04:01:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 04:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 11 05:01:41 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7lx4-0006VF-TT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 05:01:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7lx4-000281-95 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:01:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F7lvT-0001gT-NU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:59:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F7lvS-0001fx-4j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:59:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F7lvR-0001fs-V1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:59:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.111] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F7lzM-0000VN-Et for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:04:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-40-212-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.40.212]) by Relayhost2.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654967F41; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 05:59:56 +0200 (EET) Original-To: Mathias Dahl In-Reply-To: (Mathias Dahl's message of "Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:56:39 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50356 Archived-At: > If we wanted to split tumme into smaller files, I guess we should move > the tag functionality to tumme-tag.el, move image manipulation to > tumme-manip.el and so on. But as long as the size of tumme is > manageable, I think keeping it in one file is more convenient. I'm > not keen on "littering" the file system with more files. I think splitting is inevitable because the tag functionality has nothing to do with thumbnails. It is a way to associate meta information with any file in the dired buffer, not just images. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/