From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: need option so line-move-to-column ignores fields, plus patch Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:10:38 -0400 Message-ID: <87sligkja9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <2cd46e7f0608310848l743430e9ia7a1d45e22428083@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0608312339s16a2a101p8c30840bbdeb0d22@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609032143v311b670dra2d2ef679dd936@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609041256q73c0c0d3s7631a964ae9a8367@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609060952m54601787x8c91412af7fbf69f@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609070747o5028d2bewd5a9e79a5afd4a46@mail.gmail.com> <2cd46e7f0609231629hf2187cbl7e46507ee6070422@mail.gmail.com> <87zmcokjjs.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1159135733 8239 80.91.229.2 (24 Sep 2006 22:08:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 25 00:08:51 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRc9R-0004aW-Vs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:08:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRc9R-0002dl-Da for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:08:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GRc9G-0002d1-Je for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:08:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GRc9F-0002cp-9x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:08:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRc9F-0002cm-41 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:08:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.19.1.138] (helo=cyd) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GRcDV-0001P8-LW; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:12:53 -0400 Original-Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E349E4E411; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:10:38 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Ken Manheimer In-Reply-To: <87zmcokjjs.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sun\, 24 Sep 2006 18\:04\:55 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60178 Archived-At: By the way, the `linefield-example' command you provided assigns a field with a `boundary' value. Such fields are treated specially; see the docstring of `constrain-to-field'. Is this deliberate?