From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Cc: "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>,
emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: New keybinding suggestion: C-x _ for `shrink-window'
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:40:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sl3v2th3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <472470CD.8060806@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:21:49 +0100")
"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> writes:
>> My suggestion would be to have both: C-x _ as a new keybinding for
>> `shrink-window' (since we already have a key for `enlarge-window')
>> *and* bw-interactive.el, which sounds nice.
>
> It would be a bit strange, see below.
Why? Letting people have the usual keybindings like:
C-x + `balance-windows'
C-x ^ `enlarge-window'
C-x - `shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer'
[C-x _ `shrink-window'] <= according to what I suggest
*and* letting them load bw-interactive.el if they want to resize windows
interactively looks fine to me. It's simpler 1) not to rebind C-x + and
2) to have C-x + balancing the windows (instead of C-x + + which add one
keystroke.)
> bw-interactive lets you do this quite easily, with just "C-x + +" (today
> it is on "C-x +").
My point is precisely that C-x + is fine as it is.
>> A few comments on bw-interactive.el though. Assume I start with a
>> full window and have C-x + bound to `bw-start-resize-mode':
>>
>> - It seems that the first arrow keystroke says: "Hello, please start
>> resizing with arrow keys!" but wait for another keystroke. I think
>> the user might expect that the first arrow keystroke has a visible
>> effect on window resizing already.
>
> I do not believe so, but starting the resizing and telling the user what
> is going on is a bit complicated.
I don't suggest that bw-interactive.el should tell the user what is
going on. I suggest that `bw-start-resize-mode' start listening to the
next keystroke (as it does) and that the next keystroke take immediately
action. Again, it's more intuitive to me that C-x + <up> increase the
vertical size of the window immediately.
> I tried to mimic the way this is done some OS window handlers.
Which one? I'm using ratpoison. C-t C-r does the job of your C-x +,
then C-f will enlarge the ratpoison-window immediately, no need to press
C-f twice.
> When you start resizing you get into a state where the window handler
> first needs to know which border to move. The mouse pointer is then
> moved to that border.
Isn't that simpler to move the border when you know which border to
move? Maybe I'm too much thinking the ratpoison way here. An example
of a WM implementing the behavior you suggest would be useful, because
I honestly don't see why this has to be a two-step process.
>> - C-x 2 C-x + <up> won't shrink the window if it's larger than the
>> buffer; but C-x 2 C-x + <down> <up> <up> will shrink the window
>> even if it's *initially* larger than buffer. I believe that the
>> first set of keystrokes should already shrink the window, or at
>> least send an error to the user.
>
> This is a slight misunderstanding, see above.
Okay, understood.
> Maybe adding a message of some kind when exiting the minor mode for
> resizing would make thins more clear?
Yes, sure.
--
Bastien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-28 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 160+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-28 10:39 New keybinding suggestion: C-x _ for `shrink-window' Bastien
2007-10-28 10:41 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-10-28 12:06 ` Bastien
2007-10-28 11:21 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-10-28 14:40 ` Bastien [this message]
2007-10-28 20:20 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-10-28 21:47 ` Bastien
2007-10-28 22:05 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-10-29 0:03 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-10-29 8:43 ` Bastien
2007-10-29 0:11 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-31 11:58 ` Bastien
2007-10-31 15:54 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-10-31 16:18 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-10-31 17:31 ` Bastien
2007-10-31 23:58 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-01 0:26 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-01 1:14 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-11-01 1:28 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-01 1:46 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-11-01 2:17 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-01 3:41 ` Bastien
2007-11-01 1:13 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-11-01 19:04 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-03 21:56 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2007-11-04 1:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-11-04 2:49 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2007-11-04 19:56 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-31 16:20 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-10-31 23:58 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-01 16:54 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-01 22:01 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-01 22:27 ` David Kastrup
2007-11-01 23:05 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-02 14:28 ` Bastien
2007-11-02 14:28 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-03 0:20 ` Bastien
2007-11-03 3:58 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-03 4:14 ` Miles Bader
2007-11-03 5:46 ` Bastien
2007-11-03 5:35 ` Miles Bader
2007-11-03 14:11 ` Bastien
2007-11-03 15:15 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-03 16:43 ` Bastien
2007-11-03 16:43 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-04 0:11 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-05 3:30 ` Bastien
2007-11-05 7:37 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-05 11:06 ` Bastien
2007-11-08 15:32 ` Bastien
2007-11-10 1:09 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-10 1:11 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-11 5:00 ` Bastien
2007-11-11 8:42 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-11 17:17 ` Bastien
2007-11-11 17:26 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-11 23:54 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-12 0:07 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-12 3:20 ` Bastien
2007-11-12 2:55 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-12 4:18 ` Bastien
2007-11-12 11:47 ` Robert J. Chassell
2007-11-12 13:47 ` Bastien
2007-11-12 19:03 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-12 21:20 ` Robert J. Chassell
2007-11-12 21:31 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-12 22:09 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-12 22:51 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-14 0:26 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-16 23:49 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-17 1:36 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-17 9:09 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-17 15:44 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-17 17:28 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-12 21:41 ` Robert J. Chassell
2007-11-12 22:15 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-13 13:40 ` Bastien
2007-11-13 17:51 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-11-14 0:58 ` Bastien
2007-11-14 2:48 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-14 8:45 ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-11-13 23:52 ` Juri Linkov
2007-11-14 1:05 ` Bastien
2007-11-12 17:18 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-12 17:28 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-11 14:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-11-11 17:11 ` Bastien
2007-11-11 19:33 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-12 3:19 ` Bastien
2007-11-12 17:18 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-13 13:25 ` Bastien
2007-11-13 18:49 ` Robert J. Chassell
2007-11-14 0:27 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-14 14:41 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-14 1:14 ` Bastien
2007-11-14 1:56 ` Robert J. Chassell
2007-11-15 20:52 ` Bastien
2007-11-15 20:57 ` Bastien
[not found] ` <473CBBA7.8090507@gmail.com>
2007-11-16 12:39 ` Bastien
2007-11-14 17:53 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-14 18:12 ` Bastien
[not found] ` <473B7CDD.4040401@gmail.com>
2007-11-15 21:05 ` Bastien
2007-11-15 21:38 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-15 22:27 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-16 12:41 ` Bastien
2007-11-16 21:52 ` Juri Linkov
2007-11-17 0:10 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-17 1:45 ` Juri Linkov
2007-11-17 9:28 ` martin rudalics
2007-11-17 11:58 ` Bastien
2007-11-17 2:17 ` Bastien
2007-11-17 9:09 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-17 12:08 ` Bastien
2007-11-17 17:28 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-18 0:10 ` Bastien
2007-11-19 1:20 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-19 2:45 ` Bastien
2007-11-19 6:48 ` Drew Adams
2007-11-17 15:59 ` Juri Linkov
2007-11-17 16:34 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-17 16:38 ` Juri Linkov
2007-11-17 17:25 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-17 23:52 ` Bastien
2007-11-17 23:51 ` Bastien
2007-11-18 0:16 ` Juri Linkov
2007-11-18 2:16 ` Bastien
2007-11-18 2:31 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-18 12:04 ` Juri Linkov
2007-11-19 2:23 ` Bastien
2007-11-14 23:09 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-14 23:46 ` Juri Linkov
2007-11-15 0:21 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-15 1:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-11-15 8:29 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-11-16 1:16 ` Juri Linkov
2007-11-16 12:58 ` Bastien
2007-11-16 15:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-11-16 17:13 ` Bastien
2007-11-16 18:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-11-16 19:19 ` Bastien
2007-11-16 21:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-11-17 2:26 ` Bastien
2007-11-17 4:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-11-17 11:54 ` Bastien
2007-11-18 3:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-11-19 2:30 ` Bastien
2007-11-15 13:07 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-15 13:07 ` Richard Stallman
[not found] ` <E1Ir5H0-0002Ty-Jz@fencepost.gnu.org>
2007-11-11 17:10 ` Bastien
2007-11-11 23:54 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-12 3:33 ` Bastien
2007-11-12 17:18 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-13 13:27 ` Bastien
2007-11-11 23:54 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-12 3:36 ` Bastien
2007-11-18 22:46 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-19 2:34 ` Bastien
2007-11-02 16:51 ` Sascha Wilde
2007-10-31 23:58 ` Richard Stallman
2007-11-01 6:30 ` David Kastrup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sl3v2th3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx \
--to=bzg@altern.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=lennart.borgman@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).