From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Change the default binding of C-x C-e ? Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:15:08 +0900 Message-ID: <87sl1atrsj.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199664728 585 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2008 00:12:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tom Tromey Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 07 01:12:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JBfbN-0004x7-GH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:12:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBfb0-0003xj-KR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JBfaw-0003xe-5O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:11:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JBfau-0003xS-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:11:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBfau-0003xP-IU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:11:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBfau-0002EY-7t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:11:56 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB681535A8; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 09:10:23 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 48D021A29E5; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 09:15:09 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" (+CVS-20071205) XEmacs Lucid X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86410 Archived-At: Tom Tromey writes: > For interactive elisp hacking I redefine eval-last-sexp to treat a > defvar more like a defconst. This is pretty handy since it means I > don't have to modify the source or copy/paste/modify sexps in order to > do what I (usually) want. XEmacs's eval-last-sexp also does this (by default) and issues a warning that the defvar has been treated as a defconst. As a possibly useful data point, I do not recall seeing a complaint about this (I've been following the XEmacs developer's list religiouusly and the newsgroup intermittently since 1997).