From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes? Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:44:51 -0500 Message-ID: <87skarapxo.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87fx6sm8yl.fsf@telefonica.net> <873a2slzrr.fsf@telefonica.net> <83ws03db8v.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262288716 14301 80.91.229.12 (31 Dec 2009 19:45:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 31 20:45:08 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NQQxH-0005pe-6l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:45:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45134 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQQxH-0007UM-Hr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:45:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQQxB-0007Th-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:45:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQQx6-0007Rz-Ih for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:45:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58085 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQQx6-0007Rw-Fd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:44:56 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([66.146.206.141]:50991) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQQx4-0003Ni-Rg; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:44:55 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32800 helo=kfogel-work ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NQQx3-000773-9n; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:44:53 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:37:10 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119167 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: >> IOW, what annoys Juanma Barranquero, will probably annoy a few more, >> so I would not dismiss that as Juanma's private problems whose >> solution concerns no one but Juanma ;-) > >Well, I can agree with that if you can agree that perhaps rebase >*could be* the best fix after all... ;-) I've never used 'bzr rebase', and have no competency to evaluate the arguments either way here, but... wouldn't something would smell fishy if rebase were part of our regular workflow? That somehow seems wrong. If we find we're about to recommend that, please ask on the Bazaar list first (maybe you have already).