From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Getting full bug database dump? Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:31:00 -0500 Message-ID: <87ska8k8jv.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87iqb5o7ie.fsf@red-bean.com> <87k4vkltop.fsf@red-bean.com> <87wrzkogph.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263484155 25412 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2010 15:49:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 16:49:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVRwW-00083r-H1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:49:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35615 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRwX-0001a0-CI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRfH-0007Xy-C8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:31:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRfC-0007SE-9f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:31:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41908 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVRfC-0007Rv-2V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:31:10 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([66.146.206.141]:56756) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVRfB-0000No-Hx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:31:09 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47662 helo=kfogel-work ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NVRf9-0005Ox-7A; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:31:07 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87wrzkogph.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:21:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120000 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: >Debbugs has a SOAP interface. Via this, you can retrieve bug data in XML >format. Ah, thanks! Yidong already made a dump, which I'm fetching (once my ssh to fencepost is working), so I'll just make a note of the SOAP interface. >A while ago, I've started to write a package xesam-debbugs.el. It ask >interactively for a filter of the bugs, retrieves them via the SOAP >interface, and displays them in a buffer. Everything asynchronously, >Emacs is not blocked. > >The package is unfinished. I lost interested when I found out, that the >SOAP interface of debbugs does not support sorting (which is >inconvenient for a larger number of bugs returned). > >However, it might be worth to continue the work? Hmm. I can see how it would be useful, but if it would still be one-way, I'm not it would be worth it... If it integrated with message-mode, to make it two-way, that would be something.