From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Get rid of cut buffer code, any objections? Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 04:54:52 +0900 Message-ID: <87sk1xkxdf.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <4C7A97E8.9090707@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283112005 5877 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2010 20:00:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:00:05 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 29 22:00:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Opo2r-0002Th-KH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:00:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44461 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Opo2r-0005pH-3S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:00:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42499 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Opny3-0003Fc-Ew for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:55:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Opny2-0001Ui-DR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55273) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Opny2-0001UA-6Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Opny0-0008Hu-CO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:55:00 +0200 Original-Received: from 218.231.154.125.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([218.231.154.125]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:55:00 +0200 Original-Received: from miles by 218.231.154.125.eo.eaccess.ne.jp with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:55:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.231.154.125.eo.eaccess.ne.jp System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Cancel-Lock: sha1:atBJUgWKE3d2rUwbbEq99OB3NHo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129403 Archived-At: Jan Djärv writes: > I have started to remove cut-buffer support for X11 (nothing checked in > sofar). Are there any objections? nope, but man, googling for "x11 cut buffers" dragged up an old netnews post with jwz going wild with the term 'FSFmacs"... :O -miles -- Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen